Restore the missing responsive breakpoints on one screen
A screen that only works at the width it was designed at, corrected at each supported breakpoint.
The ticket
Make one screen work at every supported breakpoint.
Acceptance criteria
- The screen is usable at each supported breakpoint
- Screenshots at each are attached
- No horizontal scrolling appears on the page body
- Layout uses the project's existing responsive conventions
What lands as proof
A screenshot per breakpoint, which is the only way to show the layout holds rather than merely that it compiles.
Why teams defer it
- It is checked at one width during development and at every width by users.
- Fixing it often reveals the layout was never structured for it, which turns a tweak into a rebuild.
Questions
- What does the agent actually change?
- The ticket is scoped to one outcome: make one screen work at every supported breakpoint. Work that serves that outcome is in scope, and anything outside it is left for a separate ticket, so the pull request stays reviewable.
- How do I know the work is done?
- The pull request carries the evidence, not only the diff. Here that means screenshots at each breakpoint in the pull request, so a reviewer can confirm the result without reproducing the work locally.
- How much oversight does this need?
- The run stops once the plan is written. Somebody reads the approach and approves it before any code exists, which is the cheapest moment to redirect the work.