Now in closed beta.Book a demo to get started.
Use cases

Make a consumer idempotent so a redelivery stops causing a second effect

Queues, jobs, and async work|The work pauses once the plan is written. Somebody reads the approach and approves it before any code exists, and the run continues from there.

A consumer that charges twice when a message is redelivered, made safe to receive the same message again.

The ticket

Make one queue consumer idempotent under redelivery.

Acceptance criteria

  • Delivering the same message twice produces one effect
  • The deduplication key is derived from the message, not from arrival time
  • A test replays a message and asserts a single effect
  • Deduplication records expire on a stated schedule

What lands as proof

A replay test asserting one effect from two deliveries, which is the entire guarantee.

Why teams defer it

  • At-least-once delivery is in the documentation and out of mind until a duplicate reaches a customer.
  • Choosing the deduplication key needs somebody who knows what makes a message logically the same.

Questions

What does the agent actually change?
The ticket is scoped to one outcome: make one queue consumer idempotent under redelivery. Work that serves that outcome is in scope, and anything outside it is left for a separate ticket, so the pull request stays reviewable.
How do I know the work is done?
The pull request carries the evidence, not only the diff. Here that means replay test proving one effect from two deliveries, so a reviewer can confirm the result without reproducing the work locally.
How much oversight does this need?
The run stops once the plan is written. Somebody reads the approach and approves it before any code exists, which is the cheapest moment to redirect the work.

Ready to put the fleet to work?

Contact us for a demo with an expert.